R&D Is An InvestmentInvest: "To spend or utilize time, money, or effort for future advantage or benefit."
Expense: "The cost involved in some activity; a sacrifice; a price."
The federal government supports a unique world-class research and education enterprise that fuels the American economy. It provides the underpinning of high-technology industries, expands the frontiers of knowledge, and trains future generations of scientists, engineers, and mathematicians. The federal investment in R&D has led to job growth in new and old industries and has produced a standard of living that is unparalleled in our Nation's history.
Today, Congress is challenged with developing a plan that will bring the federal budget into balance. That goal, however, cannot be reached unless the American economy continues to grow, productivity continues, and inflation is held in check. Technology is the key. According to many economists, Technology is largely responsible for the enduring strength of the current economic expansion and the low rate of inflation that we have experienced in recent years. Federal support of research is, in reality, critical to almost any balanced budget plan.
Although the forecast for federal R&D funding has improved over past budget proposals, the long-term trends are still uncertain as the Administration and Congress press for a balanced budget. Between FYÕs 1994-1998, R&D funding declined by 2.5% in constant dollars. Last year, the President's R&D budget for FY 1998 would cut the federal investment by an additional 14% (in inflation-adjusted dollars) by 2002.[3] Two years ago, Congress proposed an even sharper reduction in R&D by the year 2002. This year, the President has requested significant increases for science and technology over the next five years, indicating that the message of investment for the future is being heard. For FY 1999, the President has requested a 2.6 percent increase for overall federal R&D and an increase of 5.8 percent for nondefense R&D. It is particularly important that federal support for academic research continues to grow at a time when industry is increasingly focused on shorter-term results in areas of known industrial needs rather than on the long-range needs of the Nation.[4]
The budget challenges facing Congress are exceedingly difficult. Certainly, leading for the future is no easy task. But tomorrow, without sustained federal support for R&D, our economy and quality of life may no longer be world-class. Can the Nation afford it?
"Economists have found high rates of return to private R&D investment, averaging 20-30 percent annual return on investment to firms, and approximately 50% to society overall. For some specific products, rates of return have been remarkably high. One study of information technology found that returns are estimated to have exceeded 80 percent per year between 1987 and 1991."
NSF FYI - Backgrounder on Economic Impact of R&D, 2/6/97
______________
1 The Increasing Linkage between U.S. Technology and Public Science, by Francis Narin, et al, CHI Research, Inc., March 17, 1997.
2 Results of focus groups conducted by Public Opinion Strategies and Luntz Research and Strategic Services - commissioned by a group of high-tech companies.
3 American Association for the Advancement of Science, Preview of AAAS Report XXII, R&D FY 98 (3/24/97)
4 Results of an Industrial Research Institute Roundtable, August 1995.
R&D - A Continuous Process
What is important is that all three parts are crucial to the whole. In particular, basic research must be recognized as providing an indispensable underpinning of the full R&D picture. A complex, highly interactive progression often exists from basic to applied research, to development and implementation. Although it is true that basic research can drive applied research and development, it is often the other way around. The interplay is multidimensional, reinforcing the sense of R&D as a continuum of activities where each of the three main parts have important, interactive roles to play.
In the post-Cold War era, the Nation's research enterprise faces many challenges - but none is greater than the uncertain role of the federal government. Today's legislative priority is balancing the budget. When it comes to decisions about federal support of R&D, the interrelationship between different stages of research and the long-term implications of today's decisions for our Nation's economy and people must be taken into account. R&D is the reason that we have a world-class lifestyle and economy. To assure a future with the same cutting-edge medical, environmental, communications, educational, industrial and other capabilities we have today, we must maintain the proper balance among the elements of basic research, applied research, and development and we must sustain the whole. The components of the research chain may be described as follows:
Basic research
Involves study and discovery of fundamental phenomena in science and technology as they relate to the development of new knowledge and improved applications. Basic research also renews our S&T workforce, and shapes the direction of subsequent R&D.
Applied research
Involves examining and analyzing scientific and technological applications in terms of the underlying principles, as well as verifying new concepts. As with basic research, applied research also can lead to new concepts and methods.
Development
This is the process by which a new or improved applied research concept is incorporated in a device which is scheduled for production. Here, the design becomes highly specific. As with both basic and applied research, technological development and innovation can lead to new concepts and techniques.
The benefits of basic research, applied research, and technology development flow across sectors, and a box cannot be drawn around any single element. Public- and private-sector institutions that participate in the performance of R&D all directly benefit from the transfer of new knowledge, new concepts and techniques, and new processes gained through R&D. In addition, other public- and private-sector groups reap rewards. Many government laboratories and agencies have programs and policies in place that promote the process of technology transfer--whether it is improved curriculum or books for educational institutions, the creation of new businesses and partnerships, or the dual-use of technology across agencies. Industry translates innovation into products and processes, solving national problems (energy, environment, medicine, to name a few), and creating economic growth and jobs.
Some examples from the National Academy of Science's Beyond Discovery series and other sources:
Electronic mail, the World Wide Web, and better international telephone communications all depend on tiny strands of glass Ð optical fibers thinner than a human hair yet stronger than steel Ð and light in the form of tightly focused laser beams. These world-shrinking developments came from fundamental discoveries into the nature of light nearly a century ago.
Basic research into atomic clocks combined with satellite navigation technology led to development of the global positioning system (GPS). With the ability to locate an object with pinpoint accuracy, GPS has a wide range of civilian and military uses including aircraft navigation and collision-avoidance systems, rescue of ships lost at sea, and monitoring forest fires. This new technology has also become an important tool for basic research into earthquakes and volcanoes.
Ecological observations of rotating crops and livestock and animal husbandry, combined with technological advances such as better irrigation and more efficient plow design, have led to our ability to feed hundreds of millions of people. Mathematical modeling Ð combined with the research efforts of biologists, geologists, and chemists Ð is helping to tackle daunting environmental challenges ranging from acid rain to the effects of the world's oceans on global climate.
The Coalition for Technology Partnerships and the Science-Engineering-Technology Work Group encourage legislators to take into account the continuous nature of research, and to take a long view when making decisions about federal support for R&D.
Posted: December 31, 1997; Revised February 13, 1998